I publish things that in my judgment are good science.

I think there's a huge difference between describing norms in a vivid way and singling out individual people.

If you have an effect that nobody can replicate, then your phenomenon fades away. So if you want to to have a legacy, then you jolly well better have an effect that replicates.

It is typical for implicit status hierarchies of influence and esteem to emerge in interpersonal encounters, especially those that are goal oriented.

Promoting open and critical and respectful scientific discourse seems like a pretty good goal to me.

In these unfiltered, un-moderated social media posts people are speculating about others' motivations. And you could no more put that in a peer review for a journal than you could fly.

Nothing in this world can touch or affect the one who remains in the focused pure applied awareness of the Self, the Soul (shuddha upayogi).

A movie that gets closer to the life's reality of the society finds always more words of mouth publicity in entirety.

What kind of look are you going for?” he asked instead. “Clothed.

Better is a dinner of herbs where love is than a stalled ox and hatred therewith.

What I cannot love I overlook.

I took music theory in high school and dropped out halfway through the semester because it was ruining music for me.

Biology has at least 50 more interesting years.

Our new Soviet constitution will, in my opinion, be the most democratic constitution of all those existing in the world.

The first bond of society is marriage.