I think for five lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, two million, 10 million non-human lives.

If someone is killing, on a regular basis, thousands of animals, and if that person can only be stopped in one way by the use of violence, then it is certainly a morally justifiable solution.

If (a particular researcher) won't stop when you ask nicely, when you picket in front of his house, or when you burn his car, maybe he'll stop when you hit him over the head with a two-by-four.

If killing [animal research scientists] is the only way to stop them, then I said killing them would certainly be justified.

I don’t have any doubt in my mind that there will come a time when we will see violence against animal rights abusers.

If they won't stop when you ask them nicely, they don't stop when you demonstrate to them what they're doing is wrong, then they should be stopped using whatever means are necessary.

Fear is an effective factor in altering behavior.

Whatever it takes to stop someone from abusing animals is certainly morally acceptable

The inconvenience and the suffering of any children or any family members pales in comparison to the suffering and oppression that goes on in these animal laboratories.

I am personally not advocating violence. I am simply saying that it is a morally acceptable tactic and it may be useful in the struggle for animal liberation. I don't know.

If you had to hurt somebody or intimidate them or kill them, it would be morally justifiable.

That's the difference between governments and individuals. Governments don't care, individuals do.

I'm always asked, 'What's the secret to success?' But there are no secrets. Be humble. Be hungry. And always be the hardest worker in the room.

If the patient has been to more than four physicians, nutrition is probably the medical answer.

New York is a galaxy of adventure at once elegant, exciting and bizarre. It's a city that moves so fast, it takes energy just to stand still.

So when you're dealing with an existential threat like death or like climate change, if you see it as 'we are all toast anyway,' then denial is a pretty good way of coping.

It's more important to me to get an e-mail that says, 'I saw your page and it changed my life,' than how many hits the page got.

If national pride is ever justifiable or excusable it is when it springs, not from power or riches, grandeur or glory, but from conviction of national innocence, information and benevolence.

Selfish-gene theory tells us nothing about the value of interacting through language.

Spirituality is based on development of character and philosophy.

Maybe I'm a little biased, but shows like 'Dexter' and 'Southland,' I'm just enthralled by that sort of storytelling, kind of clever and patient.