Global governance need not take a democratic form.

Utilitarianism condones killing of innocent human beings, even murder, if it makes the world a better place.

It is obvious, I think, that national democracy withers. This has to do with globalisation.

I am indeed a hedonistic utilitarian. I have defended hedonistic utilitarianism for quite a while.

Are there any good arguments in defence of moral nihilism? I think not.

It is of note that for a long time moral nihilism was a kind of unquestioned default position in analytic moral philosophy.

The possibility to go on indefinitely with our lives may become a reality and it will present us with a temptation.

It is obvious that humanity faces existential threats of a global nature. They are global in the sense that is not possible to deal with them unless we resort to global governance.

There are some particular moral truths that I believe we have access to (such as the one not to inflict pain on a sentient being for no reason).

What we need is legislation, not negotiation, for the entire globe.

To kill or not to kill, that was the question that haunted me.

Art is an other door to IMAGINATION. And without imagination nothing is possible.

It's amazing what the discovery of a corpse can do for one's spirits.

Either you run the life

Love is not blind - it sees more not less. But because it sees more it is willing to see less.

If you believe that feeling bad or worrying long enough will change a past or future event, then you are residing on another planet with a different reality system.

If you are what you eat then feed me dope.

The universe can take quite a while to deliver.

What other creature, besides the lion, the tiger, and the whale, can answer Creation in its own language?

I don't stage my own publicity.

My paintings are not meant to be tasted.