Science And Religion Quotes

Science And Religion Quote of the day

Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who sets the planets in motion.

This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.

There can never be any real opposition between religion and science; for the one is the complement of the other.

A scientific discovery is also a religious discovery. There is no conflict between science and religion. Our knowledge of God is made larger with every discovery we make about the world.

India is the mother of religion. In her are combined science and religion in perfect harmony, and that is the Hindu religion, and it is India that shall be again the spiritual mother of the world.

God is Truth. There is no incompatibility between science and religion. Both are seeking the same truth. Science shows that God exists.

Religion and science have a common ancestor - ignorance.

Science and religion are both the same thing. They're there; they're life. If it's not science, it's not a fact.

Science of yoga and ayurveda is subtler than the science of medicine, because science of medicine is often victim of statistical manipulation.

I need the binocular approach of science and religion if I am to do any sort of justice to the deep and rich reality of the world in which we live.

The person who thought there could be any real conflict between science and religion must be either very young in science or ignorant of religion.

There can be no scientific dispute with respect to faith, for science and faith exclude one another.

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature more difficult to explain than simple, statistically probable things.

Religion and science look at reality differently.

The difference between science and religion is that the former wishes to get rid of mysteries whereas the latter worships them.

The church saves sinners, but science seeks to stop their manufacture.

Since science and religion provide two different perspectives on the human situation, they must ultimately be able to be reconciled.

Science and religion will meet and shake hands.

There can be no truce between science and religion.

There is no conflict between religion and science.

The scientist believes in proof without certainty, the bigot in certainty without proof.

Religion is based, I think, primarily and mainly upon fear.

It's a common perception that science and religion are mutually exclusive. But there are many scientists who would consider themselves to be spiritual people.

No path leads from a knowledge of that which is to that which should be.

Not only were science and religion compatible, they were inseparable--th e rise of science was achieved by deeply religious Christian scholars.

There is no conflict between science and religion. Conflict only arises from an incomplete knowledge of either science or religion, or both.

Even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies.

The only way to reconcile science and religion is to set up something which is not science and something that is not religion.

Science and religion have to go hand in hand with the mystery, because there's a certain point beyond which you say, "There are no answers."

Science and religion both teach that we are all interconnected, and thus interdependent. And at the very core, we are all One. But how do we live as if we know this?

The effort to reconcile science and religion is almost always made, not by theologians, but by scientists unable to shake off altogether the piety absorbed with their mother's milk.

Are science and religion compatible? It's like, are science and plumbing compatible? They're just two different things.

In both religion and science, some people are dishonest, exploitative, incompetent and exhibit other human failings.

Without poetry our science will appear incomplete, and most of what now passes with us for religion and philosophy will be replaced by poetry.

Science and religion are in full accord, but science and faith are in complete discord.

The difference between science and religion is the difference between a willingness to dispassionately consider new evidence and new arguments , and a passionate unwillingness to do so.

As they are currently practiced, there is no common ground between science and religion... Although just as in hostage negotiations, it's probably best to keep both sides talking to each other.

Science is observing truth in the light of head. Religion is observing truth in the light of heart. Humanity is using both the lights. And education is developing that humanity.

Belief cannot be reckoned with in terms of science, for science and faith are mutually exclusive.

Science is the natural ally of religion.

I don't see why religion and science can't cooperate. What's wrong with using a computer to count our blessings?

I see no conflict between science and religion. When you take truth in either one of these realms, science or religion, they match perfectly.

Science and religion, religion and science, put it as it may, they are the two sides of the same glass, through which we see darkly until these two focus together, reveal the truth.

Believers can have both religion and science as long as there is no attempt to make A non-A, to make reality unreal, to turn naturalism into supernaturalism. (125)

Religion reveals the meaning of life, and science only applies this meaning to the course of circumstances.

I think science and religion should be separate.

poetry has been able to function quite directly as human interpretation of the raw, loose universe. It is a mixture, if you will, of journalism and metaphysics, or of science and religion.

Some of my friends like to keep science and religion together, but I certainly like to keep them separate.

Science and religion are, of course, two different ways of looking at the universe; and it's the same universe with two different windows.

There may be a conflict between softminded religionists and toughminded scientists, but not between science and religion.